SCA1
- Gene
- ATXN1
- Repeat
- CAG
- Inheritance
- Autosomal dominant
Alongside the ataxia, signs pointing to nerve pathways outside the cerebellum are common, and progression is often faster than in SCA6.
One of the more common dominant ataxias worldwide.
The condition
More than forty genetically distinct spinocerebellar ataxias have been described. Here is what the number means, and why getting a specific one is worth the wait.
The number identifies which gene carries the change — not severity, and not order of importance. The numbering is broadly historical: it reflects the order in which the types were described, which is why the low numbers are also the ones most often encountered.
It changes several things that are practically useful. Types differ in what they affect besides coordination, in typical age of onset, in pace of progression, and in which research studies someone might be eligible for. SCA7 involves the retina, which means an eye examination belongs in the picture. SCA6 tends to stay more confined to the cerebellum. A trial recruiting for SCA3 will not enrol someone with SCA6.
It also matters for the wider family, since it makes accurate genetic counselling possible for relatives who want it.
A short reference, not a complete list, and not a way to work out which type someone has. Only genetic testing does that.
Alongside the ataxia, signs pointing to nerve pathways outside the cerebellum are common, and progression is often faster than in SCA6.
One of the more common dominant ataxias worldwide.
Notably slow eye movements are a recognised feature, and some people have prominent tremor or neuropathy.
Common worldwide, and particularly frequent in parts of Cuba where founder effects concentrate it.
The picture is broad and can include eye movement changes, muscle twitching, stiffness and neuropathy as well as ataxia.
The most common SCA genotype worldwide.
Tends to stay largely confined to the cerebellum, with later onset and slower progression than SCA1, 2 or 3.
Common among the dominant ataxias, especially in later-onset presentations.
Distinctive because it also affects the retina, so vision loss can accompany or precede the ataxia. This is the one SCA where an eye examination is part of the picture.
Less common than SCA1, 2, 3 or 6.
Often begins later in life, and symptoms can come in episodes early on before becoming constant. Because it was only described recently, many people carrying it were previously told their ataxia had no identified cause.
Since its description it has been found to account for a substantial share of previously unexplained late-onset ataxia in several populations.
Types are listed by number, which carries no ranking. Because SCA27B was described relatively recently, older reference material may not mention it at all.
Autosomal dominant means one altered copy of the gene is enough to cause the condition. A parent who has it has, on average, a one-in-two chance of passing the altered copy to each child. It is the same one-in-two chance for every pregnancy — it does not even out across a family, and an unaffected older sibling tells you nothing about the next.
2 of 4 inherited it this time. Try running it again.
Each child independently has a one-in-two chance. It does not even out across a family, and an unaffected older sibling tells you nothing about the next one. That is the whole reason the number is so easy to misread.
A significant number of people with clearly inherited ataxia never get a specific genetic label. This is a gap in what science has discovered, not a gap in the care someone is receiving, and it does not change what supportive treatment is available.
It is also a moving target. SCA27B was only described recently and turned out to account for a substantial share of previously unexplained late-onset ataxia — meaning a number of people who had been told there was no answer now have one. If testing was done years ago, it can be worth asking a neurologist whether newer testing would add anything.
Sources for this page
Next
What is available now
Supportive care, and an honest account of why there is no drug list.